For your accountant · Germany
Prepared for the accountant of a German business that has signed, or is considering, a Montblanc production mandate. It describes the contract, the documents the business receives, and how each element generally presents under German rules. It is information, not advice; the reading that governs is yours.
01
A production mandate with Montblanc Capital Ltd, a company registered in Dublin, Ireland, under an Allocation Agreement. The business pays a mandate price at signature and in return holds a contractual right to the Bitcoin produced by a defined quantity of hashrate, on infrastructure Montblanc owns and operates, from the signature date to the April 2028 Bitcoin halving. Electricity is invoiced monthly in fiat and passed through at cost. Production is credited to the business daily on a public, signed ledger and settles on-chain each month to a hardware wallet the business controls. At term end a credit of 25% of the mandate price applies against a next-cycle mandate. The business acquires no hardware, no interest in specific machines and no share in Montblanc: it buys a service with a fixed term and a fixed price. Typical counterparties are a GmbH, a UG, a GmbH & Co. KG, or a sole trader or partnership preparing an Einnahmen-Überschuss-Rechnung.
02
Everything below is issued to the business in its own name and can be handed to you as it stands.
03
A payment at signature for a service delivered over a fixed term.
04
Invoiced monthly in fiat and passed through at cost. An ordinary operating expense of the period. The invoices carry the quantity, the rate and the period.
05
The BMF letter of 6 March 2025 on the income-tax treatment of crypto assets (replacing the letter of 10 May 2022) treats Bitcoin as a Wirtschaftsgut.
06
Montblanc Capital Ltd is established in Ireland and supplies a service to a business customer.
07
At term end the business holds a contractual right to a 25% reduction in the price of a next-cycle mandate. Nothing is paid out, and the right lapses if no next mandate is signed. It is generally read as a conditional price concession on a future contract, with no entry until it is used, rather than as income at term end. Your reading governs.
08
§42 AO and the case law on Gestaltungsmissbrauch scrutinise arrangements whose main purpose is a tax advantage. The mandate is a real service with a real cost: hardware procured and run for the term, electricity invoiced monthly, Bitcoin produced every day and settled monthly to a wallet the business controls, a fixed term. The business carries the economic risk of the Bitcoin price and of the network. Montblanc describes the mandate as a business expense that produces a business asset, and nothing else.
09
Montblanc Capital Ltd owns and operates Bitcoin production infrastructure for operating businesses and is registered in Dublin, Ireland. This brief is general information for professional advisers and is not tax, legal or investment advice. It describes a contract as written in October 2026; later proposals state their own terms. The client’s adviser determines the treatment that applies.